For error correction I tend to use the most frequent type of correction, recast.

For error correction I tend to use the most frequent type of correction, recast. I believe I use it because it's quick and doesn't harm fluency and communication entirely. But like Penny Ur mentioned, this type of correction all the time may be ineffective and may I add fall on deaf ears most of the times. Research shows that the best correction methods are elicitation, metalinguistic feedback and explicit correction so I feel I need to use more of these methods when correcting my students. Also, sometimes I let errors go by uncorrected mostly because I consider them minor or unimportant errors but there are times when students notice them and correct them. Perhaps it's best the teacher corrects all errors and not the students because it could come across as if the teacher wasn't listening or doesn't care and because learners would rather be corrected by the their teacher than their peers as research shows.

Comments

  1. Using technology to learn English
    Stds in pairs (peer correction involved) were asked to write in note form on advantages and risks of exponential technology. They were supposed to make a presentation as well.

    https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/BP_gjnHQIPpPN3w6WXBgXV_wSYVlrt5jXTpHj8Pb8efptABt_Q780TgqOzUTI3wenY9v-GxdD0-2ve7T5CgrznWgahCoi2Pukfs=s0

    ReplyDelete
  2. On Error Correction - slide 21/62
    Yes, students prefer "explicit correction".
    It's clearer to understand.
    Peer correction may lead to no correction at all.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Thanks Penny for sharing an interesting topic: error correction.

Title

Hi Everyone.