Hi, everyone!

Hi, everyone!
Many thanks for your contributions to this introductory discussion.
We have a very mixed group here: mostly teachers of adults and teens in the private sector, but some public school teachers as well and at least one teacher of very young learners!
Nice that some of you have been on ITDI courses with me before, or met me at conferences or through my books ... I do hope I won't repeat things you've already heard from me, and will have something new to contribute this time.
Your areas of interest are very wide-ranging, and I won't be able to cover them all. But I note that several of you are interested in error-correction, so I'll certainly be discussing that - mainly with reference to oral correction, but also writing. Dealing with mixed-ability classes, and creating engaging and interesting activities: yes, already in the first session and also in later ones. And of course practical activities... there'll be plenty of those!
Looking forward to our first session tomorrow, whatever time it works out for you!
And before I forget: could you please make sure you have a pencil and paper at your elbow, beside the computer! I want to try something out that needs them.
See you tomorrow!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

For error correction I tend to use the most frequent type of correction, recast.

For error correction I tend to use the most frequent type of correction, recast. I believe I use it because it's quick and doesn't harm fluency and communication entirely. But like Penny Ur mentioned, this type of correction all the time may be ineffective and may I add fall on deaf ears most of the times. Research shows that the best correction methods are elicitation, metalinguistic feedback and explicit correction so I feel I need to use more of these methods when correcting my students. Also, sometimes I let errors go by uncorrected mostly because I consider them minor or unimportant errors but there are times when students notice them and correct them. Perhaps it's best the teacher corrects all errors and not the students because it could come across as if the teacher wasn't listening or doesn't care and because learners would rather be corrected by the their teacher than their peers as research shows.
Read more

I posted about the Canadian government experiment called Portfolio Based Learning Assessment and noted some of the...

I posted about the Canadian government experiment called Portfolio Based Learning Assessment and noted some of the issues I had with it. Here is a blog post by a teacher who has had more experience with it. Just thinking about teaching and how to teach better... http://blog.teslontario.org/reflections-on-the-implementation-of-pbla/#.WvCDXhcUOVN.google_plusone_share
Read more